Manual Reference Pages  - STAB (8)

NAME

tc-stab - Generic size table manipulations

CONTENTS

Synopsis
Description

SYNOPSIS

tc qdisc add ... stab \

[ mtu BYTES ] [ tsize SLOTS ] \ [ mpu BYTES ] [ overhead BYTES ] [ linklayer TYPE ] ...

TYPE := adsl | atm | ethernet

For the description of BYTES - please refer to the UNITS section of tc(8).

mtu maximum packet size we create size table for, assumed 2048 if not specified explicitly
tsize required table size, assumed 512 if not specified explicitly
mpu minimum packet size used in computations
overhead per-packet size overhead (can be negative) used in computations
linklayer required linklayer adaptation.

DESCRIPTION

Size tables allow manipulation of packet size, as seen by whole scheduler framework (of course, the actual packet size remains the same). Adjusted packet size is calculated only once - when a qdisc enqueues the packet. Initial root enqueue initializes it to the real packet’s size.

Each qdisc can use different size table, but the adjusted size is stored in area shared by whole qdisc hierarchy attached to the interface. The effect is, that if you have such setup, the last qdisc with a stab in a chain "wins". For example, consider HFSC with simple pfifo attached to one of its leaf classes. If that pfifo qdisc has stab defined, it will override lengths calculated during HFSC’s enqueue, and in turn, whenever HFSC tries to dequeue a packet, it will use potentially invalid size in its calculations. Normal setups will usually include stab defined only on root qdisc, but further overriding gives extra flexibility for less usual setups.

Initial size table is calculated by tc tool using mtu and tsize parameters. The algorithm sets each slot’s size to the smallest power of 2 value, so the whole mtu is covered by the size table. Neither tsize, nor mtu have to be power of 2 value, so the size table will usually support more than is required by mtu.

For example, with mtu~=~1500 and tsize~=~128, a table with 128 slots will be created, where slot 0 will correspond to sizes 0-16, slot 1 to 17~-~32, ..., slot 127 to 2033~-~2048. Sizes assigned to each slot depend on linklayer parameter.

Stab calculation is also safe for an unusual case, when a size assigned to a slot would be larger than 2^16-1 (you will lose the accuracy though).

During kernel part of packet size adjustment, overhead will be added to original size, and then slot will be calculated. If the size would cause overflow, more than 1 slot will be used to get the final size. It of course will affect accuracy, but it’s only a guard against unusual situations.

Currently there’re two methods of creating values stored in the size table - ethernet and atm (adsl):

ethernet This is basically 1-1 mapping, so following our example from above (disregarding mpu for a moment) slot 0 would have 8, slot 1 would have 16 and so on, up to slot 127 with 2048. Note, that mpu~>~0 must be specified, and slots that would get less than specified by mpu, will get mpu instead. If you don’t specify mpu, the size table will not be created at all (it wouldn’t make any difference), although any overhead value will be respected during calculations.
atm, adsl ATM linklayer consists of 53 byte cells, where each of them provides 48 bytes for payload. Also all the cells must be fully utilized, thus the last one is padded if/as necessary.

When size table is calculated, adjusted size that fits properly into lowest amount of cells is assigned to a slot. For example, a 100 byte long packet requires three 48-byte payloads, so the final size would require 3 ATM cells - 159 bytes.

For ATM size tables, 16~bytes sized slots are perfectly enough. The default values of mtu and tsize create 4~bytes sized slots.

TYPICAL OVERHEADS

The following values are typical for different adsl scenarios (based on [1] and [2]):

LLC based:

PPPoA - 14 (PPP - 2, ATM - 12) PPPoE - 40+ (PPPoE - 8, ATM - 18, ethernet 14, possibly FCS - 4+padding) Bridged - 32 (ATM - 18, ethernet 14, possibly FCS - 4+padding) IPoA - 16 (ATM - 16)

VC Mux based:

PPPoA - 10 (PPP - 2, ATM - 8) PPPoE - 32+ (PPPoE - 8, ATM - 10, ethernet 14, possibly FCS - 4+padding) Bridged - 24+ (ATM - 10, ethernet 14, possibly FCS - 4+padding) IPoA - 8 (ATM - 8)
\p There’re few important things regarding the above overheads:
o IPoA in LLC case requires SNAP, instead of LLC-NLPID (see rfc2684) - this is the reason, why it actually takes more space than PPPoA.
o In rare cases, FCS might be preserved on protocols that include ethernet frame (Bridged and PPPoE). In such situation, any ethernet specific padding guaranteeing 64 bytes long frame size has to be included as well (see rfc2684). In the other words, it also guarantees that any packet you send will take minimum 2 atm cells. You should set mpu accordingly for that.
o When size table is consulted, and you’re shaping traffic for the sake of another modem/router, ethernet header (without padding) will already be added to initial packet’s length. You should compensate for that by subtracting 14 from the above overheads in such case. If you’re shaping directly on the router (for example, with speedtouch usb modem) using ppp daemon, you’re using raw ip interface without underlying layer2, so nothing will be added.

For more thorough explanations, please see [1] and [2].

ETHERNET CARDS CONSIDERATIONS

It’s often forgotten, that modern network cards (even cheap ones on desktop motherboards) and/or their drivers often support different offloading mechanisms. In context of traffic shaping, ’tso’ and ’gso’ might cause undesirable effects, due to massive tcp segments being considered during traffic shaping (including stab calculations). For slow uplink interfaces, it’s good to use ethtool to turn off offloading features.

SEE ALSO

tc(8), tc-hfsc(7), tc-hfsc(8),
[1] http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/tc-atm/
[2] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2684.html

Please direct bugreports and patches to: <net...@vger.kernel.org>

AUTHOR

Manpage created by Michal Soltys (sol...@ziu.info)


iproute2 STAB (8) 31 October 2011
blog comments powered by Disqus